The quick version
How Clarvia Dev and Turing position themselves — in their own words, and ours.
AI-first product development agency. We design, build, and ship complete AI products — from strategy through deployment. You get a working product, not a roster of engineers.
Global talent marketplace and staff augmentation platform. Turing connects companies with pre-vetted remote engineers from a pool of 3M+ developers, with a 97% engagement success rate. They also provide AI training data services for large language models.
Detailed comparison
A fair, category-by-category breakdown of how Clarvia Dev and Turing compare.
Clarvia Dev
End-to-end AI product development. We own the entire lifecycle: research, design, architecture, build, deployment, and iteration. You describe the problem — we deliver a product that solves it.
Turing
Talent sourcing and staff augmentation. Turing matches companies with individual engineers or teams from their global talent pool. You manage the engineers, define the work, and own the product direction.
Clarvia if you need a finished AI product built for you. Turing if you have product leadership in-house and need to fill engineering seats quickly.
Clarvia Dev
Dedicated product team working toward a defined outcome. We operate in focused sprints with a clear roadmap. You get weekly demos and a shipped product, not timesheets.
Turing
Staff augmentation model. Turing provides engineers who embed into your existing team. You direct the work, run the standups, and manage delivery. They handle sourcing, vetting, and payroll.
Clarvia if you want someone to own delivery and outcomes. Turing if you want to scale your existing engineering team with vetted talent.
Clarvia Dev
AI is all we do. Every project involves machine learning, LLMs, computer vision, or AI-driven automation. Our entire team thinks in terms of AI product architecture from day one.
Turing
AI is one skill category among many. Turing sources engineers across the full stack — frontend, backend, DevOps, data science, and AI/ML. Their AI training data business is separate from their talent marketplace.
Clarvia if AI is the core of what you are building. Turing if you need general engineering talent that may include some AI skills.
Clarvia Dev
First working prototype in 2-4 weeks. We prioritise getting something real into your hands fast so we can iterate with actual user feedback, not assumptions.
Turing
Speed depends on your internal management. Turing can source engineers in days, but the time to a working product depends entirely on how well you manage the team and define the work.
Clarvia if you need a product fast and do not have a product team to manage engineers. Turing if you already have strong technical leadership and just need more hands.
Clarvia Dev
Project-based pricing tied to deliverables and milestones. You pay for outcomes, not hours. Scope and cost are agreed before work starts.
Turing
Hourly or monthly rates per engineer, typically competitive with US market rates. Costs scale linearly with headcount. You also pay for management overhead on your side.
Clarvia if you want predictable project costs tied to results. Turing if you prefer the flexibility of scaling individual engineers up or down.
The honest recommendation
Both companies do good work. The right choice depends on what you actually need.
Choose Clarvia Dev when...
You need an AI product designed, built, and shipped — not just developers hired
You do not have a technical product team to manage individual engineers
You want a working prototype in weeks, not months of hiring and onboarding
AI is the core of your product, not a feature bolted onto existing software
You want fixed-price delivery tied to milestones, not open-ended hourly billing
Choose Turing when...
You have a strong technical team and just need to add engineering capacity
You need engineers across many disciplines, not just AI
You prefer to manage the product direction and development process yourself
You want long-term team augmentation rather than a project engagement
You need AI training data or annotation services for your own models
Common questions
Is Turing a direct competitor to Clarvia Dev?
Not really. Turing is a talent marketplace — they help you hire engineers. Clarvia is a product agency — we build the product for you. The overlap is that both serve companies wanting AI capability, but the delivery model is fundamentally different. With Turing, you manage the team. With Clarvia, we manage the delivery.
Can I use Turing to build an AI product without my own product team?
Technically yes, but it is difficult. Turing provides engineers, not product leadership. Without someone on your side defining requirements, managing sprints, and making architecture decisions, you will likely end up with hired talent but no clear direction. That is where an agency model like Clarvia adds value — we bring the product thinking alongside the engineering.
Is Clarvia more expensive than hiring through Turing?
On a per-hour basis, an agency will always look more expensive than individual contractors. But the total cost of a project includes management overhead, ramp-up time, rework, and time to market. When you factor in that Clarvia delivers a working product in weeks with no management burden on your side, the total cost often comes in lower for defined projects.
What if I need ongoing AI development after the initial product is built?
Both models work for ongoing work. Clarvia offers retainer engagements for continuous product development. Turing offers long-term placements for ongoing engineering support. The right choice depends on whether you want ongoing product ownership (Clarvia) or ongoing engineering capacity you manage yourself (Turing).
Need an AI product, not just AI developers?
Book a free 30-minute call. We will discuss your project and show you what a working prototype looks like in 2-4 weeks.